THE FORUM

21-Sep-24, 07:13:49 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Note: The views expressed on this page are not necessarily those of GVAS or Rfalconcam.
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Nikon's Small World Photography winners for 2009  (Read 4850 times)
0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.
ezsha
Tiercel
******

Like Count: 25
Offline Offline

Posts: 691


View Profile
« on: 08-Apr-10, 11:35:05 AM »

Nature in its smallest details...
Logged
MAK
Glued to Keyboard
*

Like Count: 486
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,975


Nature Rules!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: 08-Apr-10, 11:43:20 AM »

 wow
Logged

I go to nature to be soothed and healed, and to have my senses put in order.
-John Burroughs
Annette
Never Leaves 'Puter
*********

Like Count: 147
Offline Offline

Posts: 5,016



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 08-Apr-10, 11:44:20 AM »

 coolphotos
Logged

Dot_Forrester
Tiercel
******

Like Count: 50
Offline Offline

Posts: 701



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: 08-Apr-10, 12:25:34 PM »

Beautiful!!!  thumbsup

Dot in PA
Logged
Lou
Juvie
*****

Like Count: 130
Offline Offline

Posts: 340



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: 08-Apr-10, 07:35:25 PM »

I am surprised that Juergen Pfleiderer from Heilbronn, Baden-Württemberg, Germany only got an Honorable Mention for his Radula of Buccinum undatum when it is clearly superior to the Sonchus asper flower stem section submitted by Gerd A. Guenther from Düsseldorf, Germany. I can understand the accolades for the Arabidopsis thaliana (thale cress) anther and the wrinkled photoresist, but Radulas are just so much more difficult to photograph than damn Sonchus asper sections! 

Does anybody agree with me or am I out there all alone?

Lou


Logged
MAK
Glued to Keyboard
*

Like Count: 486
Offline Offline

Posts: 10,975


Nature Rules!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: 08-Apr-10, 07:37:48 PM »

 ???
Logged

I go to nature to be soothed and healed, and to have my senses put in order.
-John Burroughs
Donna
I'm Falcon Crazy
*

Like Count: 1650
Offline Offline

Posts: 25,377


<3 FLY FREE "CHARLOTTE" <3


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: 08-Apr-10, 08:58:45 PM »

???

I agree  scared blue I want to say WT?
Logged

Shaky
Bathrobe Brigadier
Administrator
Never Leaves 'Puter
*********

Like Count: 354
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,121


Working on my book


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: 08-Apr-10, 10:32:55 PM »

I'm amazed they can take pictures like that. They must use a really tiny camera.
Logged

ezsha
Tiercel
******

Like Count: 25
Offline Offline

Posts: 691


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: 08-Apr-10, 11:31:16 PM »

I'm amazed they can take pictures like that. They must use a really tiny camera.

Actually, they use different kinds of microscopes... you can see the various types and the magnification in the details of each picture... Microscopes have come a loooong way since I last used one... here's a little more information, with even more links at the end.
Logged
Shaky
Bathrobe Brigadier
Administrator
Never Leaves 'Puter
*********

Like Count: 354
Offline Offline

Posts: 7,121


Working on my book


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: 08-Apr-10, 11:46:35 PM »

Thanks! I love the retro web page.
Logged

dale
Falcon
*******

Like Count: 276
Offline Offline

Posts: 1,368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: 09-Apr-10, 02:16:27 AM »

Does anybody agree with me or am I out there all alone?
Lou

hahahaha. like you said, Lou. That one.

seriously, though, these are just gorgeous photos.
Logged
ezsha
Tiercel
******

Like Count: 25
Offline Offline

Posts: 691


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: 10-Apr-10, 10:37:08 AM »

I'm amazed they can take pictures like that. They must use a really tiny camera.

Actually, they use different kinds of microscopes... you can see the various types and the magnification in the details of each picture... Microscopes have come a loooong way since I last used one... here's a little more information, with even more links at the end.

In bopping around, I checked out the rules, which I will partially quote here:

Quote
2.  Photomicrographs must be taken using a light microscope (I stand corrected! ez), such as one of the Nikon series of compound or stereoscopic microscopes. The use of Nikon equipment is not required.

3.  Any type of specimen is acceptable. All techniques of light microscopy are acceptable: brightfield, darkfield, phase contrast, differential interference contrast, fluorescence, multiphoton, modulation contrast, Rheinberg, oblique, confocal, deconvolution, mixed techniques, etc.

Anybody interested in submitting something pf related? Submissions due by April 30...

Also, their past winners (from 2000 to 2007) are available as yearly screensavers... who knew?
« Last Edit: 10-Apr-10, 10:45:47 AM by ezsha » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Sponsored By

Times Square
powered by Shakymon